Center for Biological Diversity Department of Energy Donald Trump Eagle LNG Energy Energy Transport Solutions Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Florida East Coast Railway Fred Millar Jacksonville Port Authority Jerry Havens Kristen Monsell LNG New Fortress Rick Perry White House

LNG ‘freedom molecules’ coming soon to railroad tracks

President Donald Trump talking at Sempra Power’s Cameron Liquified Natural Fuel (LNG) Export Terminal in Hackberry, Louisiana on Might 14, 2019.

By Ann Henson Feltgen,

President Donald Trump plans
to open up the transportation of Liquefied Natural Fuel (LNG) across the United
States in railroad tanks that may hold 30,680 gallons of the extraordinarily
flammable gasoline, with as many as 100 tank automobiles per practice. And thus far, an environmental
evaluation by the Pipeline and Hazardous Supplies Security Administration has
given the plan a green mild with no further safety requirements.

When saying Trump’s April
10 government order that prompted the assessment, Division of Power Secretary
Rick Perry proclaimed LNG as “freedom molecules” that may break the Russian
hold over Japanese European nations as their sole supplier.

Trump’s plan has drawn little
public consideration to date. Nonetheless, it will permit ramping up manufacturing of
natural fuel by a way that chills it to -260° F, where it turns into a compact liquid that is cheaper to
ship. Trump’s government order does not mention that LNG, should it escape its container,
can type a flammable vapor cloud, which if ignited can kill hundreds of people
in city areas.

A draft environmental assessment is open for public remark by way of August eight. Click on this hyperlink to view and submit a remark: Draft SP20534.

Trump’s order relates to Power
Transport Options LLC (ETS), which in 2017 utilized for a special allow to
transport LNG in specialised vacuum railway tankers, as different hazardous
chemical compounds are transported.

Red Florida East Coast Railway trainA Florida East Coast locomotive with an LNG tender automotive

Final yr Florida East Coast Railway (FEC) gained federal favor to undertake a pilot program to transport by rail LNG from a small-scale production plant in Hialeah anyplace along its 351 miles of monitor. The company makes use of moveable vacuum tanks, comparable to these utilized by semi-trucks that have hauled LNG for years. The company ships more than 100,000 gallons of LNG per day to PortMiami and Port Everglades for cargo to Caribbean counties, according to its web site.

New Fortress Power

ETS is a logistics subsidiary of New Fortress Power, which is owned by Fortress Funding Group, a hedge fund. Fortress also owned FEC, the mother or father company of All Aboard Florida/Brightline until it was bought to Virgin Trains USA.

Wesley Edens founded New
Fortress Power in 2014 and has led an effort to develop the corporate into a
international, absolutely built-in power infrastructure firm with LNG manufacturing
amenities and terminals working across North America and the Caribbean,
in accordance to the company’s web site.

A man wearing a suit and glasses testifying before a microphoneSecretary of Power Rick Perry

In the mean time Fortress has its sights set on
Pennsylvania, where the company is creating pure fuel liquefying amenities
within the Marcellus Shale area that runs from the southwest to north and central
portions of the state. According to monetary documents, the company would have
the capability to produce a mean of 3.6 million gallons of LNG per day. The
facility is scheduled to be completed in early 2021.

But environmentalists and different critics are warning
concerning the dangers of LNG.

One other
undertaking in Alaska prompted the Arizona-based Middle for Biological Variety to
intervene before Federal Power Regulatory Fee’s proceedings in 2017. The
undertaking entailed an 807-mile pipeline, a liquefied pure fuel production facility
and the export of 30 million tons annually.

In accordance
to Kristen Monsell, an lawyer with the national nonprofit conservation
group, the proposal might vastly broaden drilling and hydraulic
fracturing within the Arctic.

‘A massively terrible idea’

large LNG venture is a massively horrible concept,” she stated in a press launch.
“Increasing drilling and fracking within the Arctic is incredibly dangerous, and
this polluting plan is probably going to be an economically disastrous boondoggle.
We’re intervening to shield polar bears, the climate and Alaskans from this
monstrous undertaking.”

that undertaking is now on maintain, some scientists agree with Monsell that this
is dangerous territory for U.S. oil and fuel corporations. LNG skilled Fred Millar has testified and spoken out about
LNG tasks alongside the East Coast and Florida. He believes ship transport is “a
major target for terrorists,’ and says both laws and training for emergency
first responders are missing.

Fred Millar

“LNG is where the nuclear power
business was earlier than Three Mile Island and Chernobyl and Fukushima,” he stated in
an interview.

corporations are concentrating on Florida, with Crowley
Maritime and Eagle LNG working a shore aspect LNG facility at the Crowley
Talleyrand Marine Terminal of the Jacksonville Port Authority. The companies
are planning for servicing Crowley’s new LNG-powered vessels for U.S.-Puerto
Rico commerce. Crowley operates a liquefaction plant in West Jacksonville
and transfers LNG by truck to the port.

Crowley is also setting up
a storage facility on two acres close to its port operations to hold 2,000 cubic
meters of LNG to gasoline its two LNG-powered tankers.

Two months
ago, a ribbon-cutting ceremony heralded another LNG facility opening on the St.
John’s River in Jacksonville. JAX LNG identifies itself as the primary
small-scale LNG facility in america with both on-site marine
and truck-loading capabilities. The “state-of-the-art” facility was constructed
by way of a three way partnership between Pivotal LNG and NorthStar
Midstream, a storage
and transport company.

History of LNG

which is predominately made up of methane – a greenhouse fuel – was first
produced in the USA in 1941. Though the conversion of pure fuel
to LNG was developed more than a century earlier, the know-how to mass
produce the fuel was missing.

plant in Cleveland closed three years later when a tank ruptured and spilled
hundreds of gallons of LNG into close by neighborhoods, killing 130 individuals. That
incident stifled LNG production for 15 years until know-how caught up to
present safer storage supplies.

producers continued producing LNG by way of 2010, however the U.S. was thought-about
more of an importer than exporter. Then fracking for oil and natural fuel opened
up the business.

In accordance
to the Federal Power Regulatory Fee (FERC), 110 crops that convert
pure fuel to LNG are working within the U.S. As of Might 4, export terminals have been
situated in Alaska, Louisiana, Maryland and Texas. Seven extra are permitted and
underneath development in Louisiana, Georgia and Texas. A further six crops
are accredited however haven’t yet damaged floor in Louisiana and Texas.

A large tanker ship with giant red, half-ball containers of LNG on the ocean.LNG export ship

Trump issued an government order promoting power infrastructure and economic progress on April 10. This order lays out a way to interact in large-scale LNG crops, similar to that proposed for Alaska, by skirting or altering the Clear Water Act, which stipulates that federal permit seekers must show that their actions won’t hurt state water high quality standards. Some states have used the Clear Water Act to block LNG manufacturing and transportation.

The order directs the Secretary of Transportation to
develop laws authorizing LNG to be transported in rail tank automobiles that
already carry other cryogenic liquids. As an alternative of planning for the worst-case
state of affairs, which till the 1990s was federal coverage, the Secretary was ordered
to use risk-based standards, grounded on the chance of a worst-case
state of affairs.

Trump is taking a look at worker retirement plans to make investments
in and underwrite the prices of whatever infrastructure might be needed to
implement this order.

All of these reviews are due by Oct. 1.

Environmental assessment

The linchpin to Trump’s plan focuses on delivery the chemical safely and cost-effectively from plant to port. Transporting LNG by truck in specialised thermos-like moveable tanks has been permitted in america for years, whereas delivery by rail has been prohibited.

Nevertheless, different hazardous supplies, like ethylene, are allowed to travel by rail when using comparable however a lot larger double-walled tanker automobiles permitted by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Canada has approved LNG transport using these automobiles.

The argument for utilizing this transport is that it is
inexpensive, emits less air pollution and offers enough security options to
hold the liquid at its optimum temperature for a minimum of 20 days. And, due to
the thickness of the chrome steel walls, the danger of punctures can be

The “rail tank automobiles are constructed to a double
pressure-vessel design with the commodity tank (internal vessel) constructed of
3/16 inch and the outer shell of higher than 7/16 inch thick steel,” the
evaluation said. Insulation between the internal and outer shells retains the
liquid’s temperature constant. The automobiles also are outfitted with aid valves.

The document acknowledges the potential for derailment
and tank punctures.

“There are not any
check knowledge or pc models that might be used to predict the chance of
puncture at any specific velocity, or determine a threshold velocity at which the
chance of puncture of the internal tanks becomes excessive,” the assessment said.

The results of derailment and puncture state of affairs lead
to “a better chance of a fireplace due to the formation of a flammable fuel
vapor/air combination in the instant vicinity of the spilled LNG” and a spark or
scorching surface might ignite a flammable vapor cloud.

General, the doc concludes that while the
consequences might be grave, the chance of such a state of affairs is low.

Scientists disagree

Jerry Havens, a retired professor at the College of
Arkansas Department Of Chemical Engineering, has voiced his concern about LNG
for years. He’s thought-about a worldwide professional on LNG’s risks. He has stated he
is just not for or towards natural fuel however needs enough precautions taken for
its transfer and storage.

Havens did not respond to a Florida Bulldog request for an interview. He has testified at a quantity
of federal hearings on the topic. In 2005, for example, he testified at a
listening to before the Federal Power Regulatory Fee a few proposed Long
Seashore, California LNG import venture, laying out the problems with an LNG incident:

  • A
    flammable vapor cloud might unfold for Three-miles from a spillage of 3-million
  • A
    flammable vapor might journey a shorter distance from the location, ignite and kill
    or burn a big number of individuals in a densely populated area.
  • And,
    nowhere did the proposed undertaking handle the potential impacts of a boiling liquid
    increasing vapor explosion that can occur with LNG. Nor did the company think about
    the hazard of LNG vapors exploding when in confined areas.
  • There
    is clearly a danger of an LNG spill and pool hearth from a terrorist assault at an
    LNG terminal, he said.
  • An
    explosion can occur all of the sudden as properly. Apart from the spreading of the hearth and
    different consequential or cascading results, after the preliminary explosion or hearth,
    much of the preliminary opposed impacts wouldn’t be mitigated.

Havens and different scientists have an enormous drawback with
corporations that use personal consultants to downplay the threats involved in LNG
production and transport. He submitted a place paper to the Pipeline and
Hazardous Supplies Safety Administration in July 2016 opposing the secrecy of
models used that downplay the hazard of LNG manufacturing and transport. Because
these fashions have been developed by personal consultants, they’re thought-about
proprietary and different scientists can’t replicate the outcomes.

“There isn’t any query
that the hazards attending the dealing with and storage of extremely giant
portions of probably flammable/explosive supplies in LNG amenities,
which if the hazard determinations aren’t accurate, might end in
catastrophic injury, extending beyond facility boundaries,” he said.

“There have to be a way developed to be sure that the general public
is offered info adequate to independently confirm the accuracy and
applicability of the mannequin predictions that decide FERC’s willpower for
or towards LNG facility approval.”

Millar, the outspoken professional on LNG tasks in
Florida, believes the U.S. Coast Guard, the governing authority for ports, is
ill-prepared for what might happen. The Coast Guard didn’t return Florida Bulldog telephone messages for

He stated the Coast Guard doesn’t regulate port
activities, “but only offer voluntary guidance to the maritime industry,”
adding that he was advised the Coast Guard “can’t regulate this business onerous,
because they’re our eyes and ears within the maritime world, and they might stop
talking to us.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email